Some of the foregoing factors offer credence for the contention one metaphor are an analogous label. This might be corroborated from the St Thomas’ procedure in question 13 from the latest Prima Pars , once the into the post three, when he requires or no name’s told you securely away from Jesus, the opposition lead towards the enjoy are between utilize proprie and you can improprie into the second identified having metaphor. Following, for the post half a dozen, when he requires in the event the labels well-known to help you Jesus and animals is first said away from pets, the differences proprie/improprie seems to be an effective subdivision off analogous identity. St Thomas begins from the stating that «during the omnibus nominibus quae de pluribus analogice dicuntur, necesse est quod omnia dicuntur for each and every respectum post unum: ainsi que ideo illud unum oportet quod ponatur for the definitione omnium. Ainsi que quia ratio quam significat nomen for each prius dicitur de- eo quod ponitur in definitione aliorum, ainsi que for every posterius de- aliis, secundum ordinem quo appropinquant advertising illud primum vel magis vel without.» This will be exemplified of the dated reliable, «match.» «Sic therefore omni nomina quae metaphorice de Deo dicuntur for every single prius de creaturis dicuntur quam de Deo: quia dicta de- Deo, nihil aliud extreme quam similitudines post reports creaturas.» St. Thomas sees this new similarity from proportion ( similitudo proportionum ) implied within the «cheerful meadow» and in contacting Goodness an effective lion.
When he continues to speak out-of other names «quae non metaphorice dicuntur de- Deo,» the obvious effect would be the fact he or she is speaking out of other times regarding analogous names than metaphors
Are there texts in which St Thomas opposes metaphor and analogy? If we consider the fresh new reviews on Metaphysics , we discover St Thomas pinpointing «potency» into the analogous and equivocal modes. «Potency» mode several things. «Sed ista multiplicitas quantum post quosdam analogiae.» The fresh new equivocal modes of efficiency was exemplified in addition i speak of step three into 3rd strength as well as the brand new cube because the electricity of your range. «Mais aussi propter hoc for every single quamdam similitudinem dicitur potens when you look at the quadratum, sicut dicitur materia potens during the rem» Again a beneficial proportionality see. These particular equivocal modes really are metaphors is clear throughout the synchronous passing in book Delta during the leaving comments on what St Thomas begins, «Ostendit quomodo potentia sumatur metaphorice.» What makes these settings metaphorical rather than analogical? «Their thus modis praetermissis, considerandum est de potentiis, quae reducuntur advertisement unam speciem, quia quaelibet earum est principium quoddam, mais aussi omnes potentiae sic dictae reducantur offer aliquid principium ex quo omnes aliae dicuntur.» Simply speaking, St Thomas right here opposes metaphor so you’re able to analogous spends off a name due to the fact second rather than the previous include a decrease to help you what is generally denominated by keyword at issue whereas, is always to they you want buy college essays pointing out, in the text of your Summa we felt one minute back, the latest metaphor was not renowned from the extension proprie about this foundation. Or is it the manner of regard to what’s principally signifed of the name which differentiates metaphor away from example, incorporate proprie off improprie ? Something entitled metaphorically try, anyway, delivered to be the same as precisely what the identity properly means.
What we are going to be looking for is a few way of justifying the brand new fairly well-known improvement of metaphor and you can analogy in a fashion that no notice is designed to Cajetan’s department from analogy towards attribution and you can right proportionality
An aporia enjoys obviously came up, thus, and its resolution is only able to become got from the determining exactly what good metaphor was and you can exactly what an analogous name is. Ways to such questions is allow me to see the apparently conflicting comments of Aquinas.